Why people look for a CamGo alternative
Almost nobody leaves a random chat site because it is broken. They leave because the odds stop feeling worth the time. A queue that matches anyone with anyone is fair, and fair is not the same as useful when you opened the site with a specific kind of conversation in mind.
The second reason is control. On a purely random platform your only lever is the skip button. Press it enough times and you are not really choosing, you are filtering by exhaustion. Being able to open a list, see who is actually online and start the call yourself changes the shape of the evening more than any feature list does.
There is also a quieter reason, and it shows up in how people actually use these sites. A random queue rewards volume: the more calls you burn through, the better your odds. That works fine for ten minutes and badly for an hour, because the part that makes it enjoyable, an actual conversation, is the part volume keeps interrupting. Deciding who appears in advance is a way of trading breadth for something that survives past the first minute.
The third is time. Most people are not looking for a long session. They want a real conversation with someone worth talking to inside the first minute or two. Removing the coin flip on who appears is the single biggest thing that shortens that gap, which is what a CamGo alternative is really being asked to do.
None of this makes CamGo a bad product. It is a good one, and it has the search footprint to prove people keep coming back to it. It is simply built around randomness as the point. If randomness is not the point for you, a site that decided that question in advance will feel better from the first call.
Also on LivCam Chat: two-way cam2cam call, free cam chat, another site people compare it with